Case Law Research

Allahabad High Court : Ginni Filaments Limited Unit -1 Vs The Commisioner Of Central Excise : 18th January, 2017

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

Court No. - 35

Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 148 of 2016

Ginni Filaments Limited Unit -1
Petitioner

Vs

The Commisioner Of Central Excise
Respondent

Counsel for Petitioner :- Suyash Agarwal,Rakesh Ranjan Agrawal
Counsel for Respondent :- Ramesh Chandra Shukla,Praveen Kumar

Hon’ble Bharati Sapru,J.
Hon'ble Vinod Kumar Misra,J.


Counter and Rejoinder Affidavits have been exchanged in this matter. The record was summoned from the department to show that the appeal filed before the Commissioner as asserted by them on 21st June, 2010 was entered in the register or not.


A perusal of the register, which have been produced before the Court shows that the appeal, which is appended as Annexure No.6 to the Writ Petition has not been entered in the said register. However, Annexure No.6 filed along with the writ petition does bear a seal of the department showing that it was served in the department on 21.06.2010.


In view of the above, the appeal of the assessee may be entertained and decided on merits by the authority concerned treating it to have been filed on 21.06.2010. The petitioner may produce a copy of the appeal before the respondent no.1 as it was filed on that date within the next ten days and the same may be heard and disposed of in accordance with law by the authority concerned within the next three months.


This Writ Petition is disposed of as above. No costs.


A copy of this order be given to Sri Praveen Kumar, who has appeared for the department within 24 hours for communication and compliance.


(Vinod Kumar Misra, J.)                 (Bharati Sapru, J.)

Order Date :- 18.1.2017


S.P.

Additional Info

  • Date Range: Wednesday, 18 January 2017
  • Court/Authority: High Court
  • Tax Type: Central Excise
  • Petitioner/Appellant: Ginni Filaments Limited Unit -1 Vs The Commisioner Of Central Excise
  • Respondent: Ginni Filaments Limited Unit -1 Vs The Commisioner Of Central Excise
  • Appl no. or Appl year: Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 148 of 2016
  • Supreme Court Location: Delhi
  • High Court Location: Allahabad High Court
  • AAR Location: Delhi
  • Authority: Supreme Court

A New Feature :

Advanced Case Law Search

 

7th April, 2016

The “Advanced Case Law Search” feature in TaxQuotient  enables search on separate parameters such as Court, Tax Type, Date (from & to Range), appellant, respondent and even keywords. This helps you in locating case law you are searching for swiftly.

TIP: #1 : If you want to view the latest cases, just enter the start and end dates keeping all other boxes blank. You will get a list of all available indirect tax cases during that period.

TIP # 2 : Please keep the date range (start to end date) for upto 6 months.

TIP # 3 : Don't forget to reset the search to clear the earlier results before a new search.

Click to enter Advanced Case Law Search

 GST Bill passed by Parliament

 

 

 

The 122nd Constitution Amendment Bill introduced in Parliament in December 2014 has been passed by the Rajya Sabha and now also by the Lok Sabha with the amendments.  Now the Bill must get ratified by at least half the number of 31 State Legislatures which means 16 States and then finally get the approval from the President.

Thereafter the GST Council has to be set up which will determine the GST design at the granular level. This will include the structure of GST including scope of CGST, SGST and IGST, the taxes subsumed, the items/commodities covered and other critical aspects such as the threshold limits for taxability, exemptions, and several other parameters critical for an ideal  GST.

Further, for the GST to operate smoothly, the taxes paid on goods and services at every stage in the value chain needs to be tracked. This requires an IT infrastructure which will track the transactions and taxes paid and form the back-bone of GST. Reportedly considerable work has been already done on it, nevertheless it will need changes to correctly reflect the GST Law proposed by the GST Council and accepted by the Central & State Legislatures.

Last but not the least,  the tax authorities and other stakeholders who will implement the GST need to be trained for a smooth introduction.

Seven questions to know if you 

are paying taxes 

correctly?

If you are the CFO or the Tax Head you ought to read this. Click Here

CESTAT Updates

June- July 2016

 

Brief update on CESTAT judgements passed during June 2016 to July 2016. Please note this update is not a summary of the cases but only leads on important issues decided. The links to the judgments are also provided for the full text.

Click here for update

Our Main Services 

in Indirect Taxes

 

  • Business structuring and tax planning
  • Review of end-to-end business processes for indirect taxes
  • Strategy to prevent litigation, representation and litigation support
  • Tax compliance and tax control framework
  • Support on specific issues
Go to top