PNB fraud due to failure of internal control, says RBI.:      Celeb jeweller Nirav Modi named in PNB’s $1.77-b fraud. Bank suspends 10 officers, lodges complaint with CBI; more banks may be hit. :      Bombay High Court in a hearing on 6th Feb, 2018 says GST regime is not user friendly. :      GST Network Chairman Ajay Bhushan return simplification panel to meet industry this week to simplify the return filing process.:    Finance Secretary Hasmukh Adhia said the Government stares at a Rs 50,000 crore GST revenue shortfall in the current fiscal. :    E-Way Bill which was to be rolled-out on 1st Feb is deferred to month-end due to technical glitches.:      TN raked in 22% more GST at Rs 23,318 crore between Jul-Dec 2017, against Rs 19,018 crore under VAT in the corresponding period the previous year. :      MoS,Corp Affairs PP Chaudhary says in Rajya Sabha that Govt has detected GST evasion of Rs 5.70 Crores in 16 cases during Jul-Nov 2017 - 6th Feb 2018. :      FM, Arun Jaitley says that States are not in favour of bringing the petroleum products under GST. :      The Finance Secretary, Hasmukh Adhia says out of 7 lakh tax payers who opted for composition scheme 5 lakhs had a turnover less than Rs 5 lakhs pa, though the exemption limit is upto Rs 20 lakhs. :     
×

Warning

JUser: :_load: Unable to load user with ID: 7356

Allahabad High Court : Ginni Filaments Limited Unit -1 Vs The Commisioner Of Central Excise : 18th January, 2017

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

Court No. - 35

Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 148 of 2016

Ginni Filaments Limited Unit -1
Petitioner

Vs

The Commisioner Of Central Excise
Respondent

Counsel for Petitioner :- Suyash Agarwal,Rakesh Ranjan Agrawal
Counsel for Respondent :- Ramesh Chandra Shukla,Praveen Kumar

Hon’ble Bharati Sapru,J.
Hon'ble Vinod Kumar Misra,J.


Counter and Rejoinder Affidavits have been exchanged in this matter. The record was summoned from the department to show that the appeal filed before the Commissioner as asserted by them on 21st June, 2010 was entered in the register or not.


A perusal of the register, which have been produced before the Court shows that the appeal, which is appended as Annexure No.6 to the Writ Petition has not been entered in the said register. However, Annexure No.6 filed along with the writ petition does bear a seal of the department showing that it was served in the department on 21.06.2010.


In view of the above, the appeal of the assessee may be entertained and decided on merits by the authority concerned treating it to have been filed on 21.06.2010. The petitioner may produce a copy of the appeal before the respondent no.1 as it was filed on that date within the next ten days and the same may be heard and disposed of in accordance with law by the authority concerned within the next three months.


This Writ Petition is disposed of as above. No costs.


A copy of this order be given to Sri Praveen Kumar, who has appeared for the department within 24 hours for communication and compliance.


(Vinod Kumar Misra, J.)                 (Bharati Sapru, J.)

Order Date :- 18.1.2017


S.P.

Additional Info

  • Date Range: Wednesday, 18 January 2017
  • Court/Authority: High Court
  • Tax Type: Central Excise
  • Petitioner/Appellant: Ginni Filaments Limited Unit -1 Vs The Commisioner Of Central Excise
  • Respondent: Ginni Filaments Limited Unit -1 Vs The Commisioner Of Central Excise
  • Appl no. or Appl year: Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 148 of 2016
  • Supreme Court Location: Delhi
  • High Court Location: Allahabad High Court
  • AAR Location: Delhi
  • Authority: Supreme Court

Seven questions to know if you 

are paying taxes 

correctly?

If you are the CFO or the Tax Head you ought to read this. Click Here

Our Main Services 

in Indirect Taxes

 

  • Business structuring and tax planning
  • Review of end-to-end business processes for indirect taxes
  • Strategy to prevent litigation, representation and litigation support
  • Tax compliance and tax control framework
  • Support on specific issues


 

Brief update on CESTAT judgements passed during June 2016 to July 2016. Please note this update is not a summary of the cases but only leads on important issues decided. The links to the judgments are also provided for the full text.

Click here for update

Go to top