Single-page GST filing system to be ready in 3-6 months says Finance Secretary Hasmukh Adhia :      E-Way Bill in 6 States for intra-State movement of goods from 20th April. Maharashtra will introduce from 1st May :      GST Council keeps Reverse Charge Mechanism on hold - FinMin clarifies that businesses under composition levy need not furnish related data in GSTR-4 :      GST returns filing: Sushil Modi panel unveils new fusion model :      CBITC sets out procedure to intercept, inspect, detain, seize, release, confiscate goods and conveyances in transit :      Bombay HC - GST leviable on any "consideration" including one-time premium on lease :      Canteen Services will attract 5% GST says Advance Ruling Authority :     

AAR GST Kerala : Application by Sri. N.C. Varghese, Thrissur : GST Act, 2017 – Advance Ruling - whether GST is applicable on standing rubber trees and what would be the tax rate. : ORDER NQ. CT/3270/18-C3 dated 26th March, 2018

AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING - KERALA
Tax Tower, Killippalam, Karamana P. 0, Thiruyananthapuram - 695 002
e-mail id: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

PROCEEDINGS OF THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING
U/s.98 OF THE GOODS AND SERVICESTAX ACT, 2017.

Members present are:

1. Senthil Nathan S, IRS
Joint Commissioner,
Office of the Commissioner of Central Tax 8: Central Excise, Thiruvananthapuram.

2. N. Thulaseedharan Pillai.
Joint Commissioner (General),
Office of the Commissioner of State Taxes, Thiruvananthapuram

Sub:-GST Act, 2017 – Advance Ruling u/s 98 - rate of tax of standing rubber trees - Orders issued.

Read:-Application dated 23.02.2018 from Sri. N.C. Varghese, Thrissur

ORDER NQ. CT/3270/18-C3 DATED 26/03/2018

1. Sri. N.C. Varghese, Thrissur, a small scale contractor (hereinafter called the applicant), has preferred an application for Advance Ruling on the rate of tax of standing rubber trees. The applicant is engaged in the purchase and cutting and removal of rubber trees from the plantations of certain public sector undertakings owned by the Government of Kerala and also from private individuals. in Kerala.

2: The applicant has submitted that he had participated in the e-auction for cutting 6696 standing rubber trees from the State Farming Corporation Ltd., Vettithitta, a PSU under Central Govt. The applicant contends that the tax liability of timber and firewood/fuel wood is explained under HSN code 4401 and there is no direction to collect GST for standing trees of rubber trees which fall under HSN code 06. But, the State Farming Corporation is demanding 18%on live rubber trees. The tax liability of GST coming to effect only when the standing trees are cut down and separated into timber/wood and fuel wood/fire wood as the case may be.

3. The applicant further contends that the rubber trees are soft wood and .cannot be used for construction purposes. It is generally used for the manufacture of packing casesand plywood substitutes, etc. after necessary processing.

4. The applicant further argued that in the VAT period, since rubber wood is not useful for construction purposes, the Government of Kerala exempted the rubber trees/rubber wood from the purview of tax in order to give relief to the growers.

5. The applicant, in his application dated 23~02-2018, has raised the following questions to be determined by the Authority for Advance Ruling.

"(1) Live rubber trees under HSN code 06 the rate of tax 0 but now insisting for payment of 18% GST which according to the auction there is no clarification issued by the GST Authorities as on date in spite of letter dtd.19-12-2017 hence as per the W.A.No.245/2018of Hon'ble High Court for clarifying the GST rates.

(2) Both taxable rate of CGST and SGST for Standing Rubber Trees and Firewood. "


6. The authorised representative of the applicant was heard in the matter and the contentions raised were examined.


7. As per the terms and conditions in the e-tender of State Farming Corporation, the contractor should cut' and remove the trees from the estate. Further, no other .trees or fuel wood in the estate are allowed to be cut down or removed. As per the definition of goods in Section 2(52) of CGST Act, 2017, "goods" means every kind of movable propertv other than money and securities but includes actionable claim, growing crops, grass and things attached to or forming part of the land which are agreed to be severed before supply or under a contract of supply. ln this case, under the contract of supply, growing crops - i.e., rubber trees are agreed to be severed before supply and hence, comes under the definition of 'goods'. Thus, standing rubber trees no longer remain as such. Therefore, it can only be treated as 'wood in rough form'.

8. In GST, firewood is exempted as per HSN Code 4401. There is no differentiation between soft wood and hardwood in GST.

9. In the light of the aforesaid circumstances, we rule as under.

RULING

It is hereby clarified that rate of tax on rubber wood in the aforesaid transaction is 18%under the HSN4403.


Senthil Nathan S IRS                                                                                   N. Thulaseedharan  Pillai
Member, CGST                                                                                                             Member, SGST


To
Sri. N.C.Varghese,
S/o. N.K.Chacko,
Nettikkadan House,
Meloor.P.O., Thrissur - 680 311

Last modified on Thursday, 12 April 2018 05:21

Additional Info

  • Date Range: Monday, 26 March 2018
  • Court/Authority: AAR GST State
  • Tax Type: Goods and Services Tax
  • Subject: Application by Sri. N.C. Varghese, Thrissur : GST Act, 2017 – Advance Ruling - whether GST is applicable on standing rubber trees and what would be the tax rate. : ORDER NQ. CT/3270/18-C3 dated 26th March, 2018
  • Petitioner/Appellant: Sri. N.C. Varghese, Thrissur
  • Respondent: Sri. N.C. Varghese, Thrissur
  • Appl no. or Appl year: ORDER NQ. CT/3270/18-C3 dated 26th March, 2018
  • Supreme Court Location: Delhi
  • AAR Location: Delhi
  • Authority: Supreme Court
  • AAR GST State Location: Kerala

Seven questions to know if you 

are paying taxes 

correctly?

If you are the CFO or the Tax Head you ought to read this. Click Here


 

Brief update on CESTAT judgements passed during June 2016 to July 2016. Please note this update is not a summary of the cases but only leads on important issues decided. The links to the judgments are also provided for the full text.

Click here for update

Central, Integrated & UT Tax Notifications,Circulars

Tax type

Notification/s

Circulars

Central Tax

21 dated 18/04/18

414243 all dated 13/04/18

Central Tax Rate

10 dt 23/03/18

 -

Integrated Tax

1/2018 dt 23/03/18

2/1/2017 dt 27/09/17

Integrated Tax Rate

No 11/2018 dt 23/03/18

 -

Union Territory Tax

06/2018 dt 31/03/18

 -

Union Territory Tax Rate

10/2018 dt 23/03/18

-

Compensation Cess None so far

1/1/2017 dt 26/07/17

Compensation Cess Rate 01/2018 dt 25/01/2018  -

 Click here for earlier GST Notifications & Circulars

Circulars under C.Ex, Customs & Service Tax


  • 24th Jan 2018 - Allahabad High Court directs Govt to extend the period to file GST Tran-1 as petitioner's application for transitional credit as  electronic GST system was not accepted on the last date i.e. 27.12.2017. As a result, the petitioner was likely to suffer loss of credit due to delay. - Continental India Private Limited  Vs UOI & Ors
  • 6th Feb 2018 - Bombay High Court passed an order against a petition filed on GST. The petitioner was unable to access GST Network. E-Way Bills are yet to come into force and without it,  petitioner was unable to move goods anywhere, paralysing its business and making it unable to comply. Though the petitioner was provided partial access after the petition was filed, they are still unable to file returns. Payment of tax was not possible without filing return. The matter was posted for another hearing on 16th February.
    The Court noted that similar grievances were raised before the Allahabad High court in Continental India Private Ltd. Vs UOI Writ (Tax) No. 67 of 2018. The Division Bench directed the respondents to reopen the portal and and entertain the application of the petitioner. - Abicor and Binzel Technoweld Pvt. Ltd. V/s UOI

Economic Survey of India 2017-18

Click here for the documents

Our Main Services 

in Indirect Taxes

 

  • Business structuring and tax planning
  • Review of end-to-end business processes for indirect taxes
  • Strategy to prevent litigation, representation and litigation support
  • Tax compliance and tax control framework
  • Support on specific issues
Go to top