Case Law Research

CESTAT Chennai : M/s. Solocare Medicals (P) Ltd. Vs. CCE, Chennai IV : 17th March, 2017 Featured

IN THE CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
SOUTH ZONAL BENCH, CHENNAI

E/251/2009
(Arising out of Order-in-Appeal No. 18/2008 (M-IV) (D) dated 28.11.2008 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Chennai)

M/s. Solocare Medicals (P) Ltd.
Appellant

Vs.

CCE, Chennai  IV
Respondent

Appearance
Shri N. Viswanathan, Advocate for the Appellant
Shri S. Govindarajan, AC (AR) for the Respondent

CORAM
Honble Shri D.N. Panda, Judicial Member
Honble Shri Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Technical Member

Date of Hearing / Decision: 17.03.2017


FINAL ORDER No. 40510 / 2017

Per D.N. Panda

Learned counsel submits that the duty element paid on the input when sought to be set off against the ultimate liability on the finished goods, department denies the same on the ground that the input supplied was exempt from duty. It is further submission of the appellant that the Honble High Court of Madras in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai Vs. CEGAT, Chennai as reported in 2006 (202) ELT 753 (Mad.) has held that in the scheme of MODVAT credit which is designed to mitigate double taxation, the raw material suffering duty should get exemption when it is incorporated into the final goods and the final goods suffers duty.


2. In view of the proposition of law stated by learned counsel as has been held in the above judgment of the Honble High Court of Madras, it is agreeable that the input duty paid if it has gone into the treasury, not disputed by Revenue, manufacturer-appellant cannot be denied credit thereof while that is set off against the final goods liable to duty, irrespective of the Revenues claim that the input was exempted from duty. Accordingly, appeal is allowed.


(Dictated and pronounced in open court)


(MADHU MOHAN DAMODHAR)                 (D.N. PANDA)
Technical Member                     Judicial Member
Rex

Additional Info

  • Date Range: Friday, 17 March 2017
  • Court/Authority: CESTAT
  • Tax Type: Central Excise
  • Petitioner/Appellant: M/s. Solocare Medicals (P) Ltd. Vs. CCE, Chennai IV
  • Respondent: M/s. Solocare Medicals (P) Ltd. Vs. CCE, Chennai IV
  • Appl no. or Appl year: E/251/2009
  • Supreme Court Location: Delhi
  • CESTAT Location: Ahmedabad
  • AAR Location: Delhi
  • Authority: Supreme Court

A New Feature :

Advanced Case Law Search

 

7th April, 2016

The “Advanced Case Law Search” feature in TaxQuotient  enables search on separate parameters such as Court, Tax Type, Date (from & to Range), appellant, respondent and even keywords. This helps you in locating case law you are searching for swiftly.

TIP: #1 : If you want to view the latest cases, just enter the start and end dates keeping all other boxes blank. You will get a list of all available indirect tax cases during that period.

TIP # 2 : Please keep the date range (start to end date) for upto 6 months.

TIP # 3 : Don't forget to reset the search to clear the earlier results before a new search.

Click to enter Advanced Case Law Search

 GST Bill passed by Parliament

 

 

 

The 122nd Constitution Amendment Bill introduced in Parliament in December 2014 has been passed by the Rajya Sabha and now also by the Lok Sabha with the amendments.  Now the Bill must get ratified by at least half the number of 31 State Legislatures which means 16 States and then finally get the approval from the President.

Thereafter the GST Council has to be set up which will determine the GST design at the granular level. This will include the structure of GST including scope of CGST, SGST and IGST, the taxes subsumed, the items/commodities covered and other critical aspects such as the threshold limits for taxability, exemptions, and several other parameters critical for an ideal  GST.

Further, for the GST to operate smoothly, the taxes paid on goods and services at every stage in the value chain needs to be tracked. This requires an IT infrastructure which will track the transactions and taxes paid and form the back-bone of GST. Reportedly considerable work has been already done on it, nevertheless it will need changes to correctly reflect the GST Law proposed by the GST Council and accepted by the Central & State Legislatures.

Last but not the least,  the tax authorities and other stakeholders who will implement the GST need to be trained for a smooth introduction.

Seven questions to know if you 

are paying taxes 

correctly?

If you are the CFO or the Tax Head you ought to read this. Click Here

CESTAT Updates

June- July 2016

 

Brief update on CESTAT judgements passed during June 2016 to July 2016. Please note this update is not a summary of the cases but only leads on important issues decided. The links to the judgments are also provided for the full text.

Click here for update

Our Main Services 

in Indirect Taxes

 

  • Business structuring and tax planning
  • Review of end-to-end business processes for indirect taxes
  • Strategy to prevent litigation, representation and litigation support
  • Tax compliance and tax control framework
  • Support on specific issues
Go to top