Case Law Research

CESTAT Chennai : Southern Petrochemical Industries Corporation Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Tirunelveli : 13th March, 2017

CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
SOUTH ZONAL BENCH
CHENNAI

Appeal No. E/711/2007
[Arising out of Order-in-Original No.30/COMMR/07 dt. 11.07.2007 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Tirunelveli]

Southern Petrochemical Industries Corporation Ltd.
Appellant

Versus

Commissioner of Central Excise, Tirunelveli
Respondent

Appearance:
Ms.Minchu Mariam Punnoose, Advocate For the Appellant
Shri S. Govindarajan, AC (AR) For the Respondent

CORAM :

Honble Shri D.N. Panda, Judicial Member
Honble Shri Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Technical Member

Date of Hearing / decision :13.03.2017

FINAL ORDER No.40485/2017

Per: D.N. Panda

Appellant says that this case is similar to that was dealt by Tribunal in Final Order Nos.42481/2016 dt. 19.12.2016 and 40285/2017 dt.23.01.2017 in respect of the same appellant. According to Revenue, appellant adopted sale price of Rs.200/- per MT in respect of clearance made to its related buyers while that was Rs.1800/- when sold to others. Appellant clarifies that the goods sold to other independent buyer viz. SIGCIL, was upon undertaking additional processes as stated in para (f) of the reply to the SCN filed before the authority on 15.6.2007 (Ref. Page 27 of the appeal folder). But unprocessed goods were sold to related party i.e. TAC. It is further clarification of the appellant that volume of sale between related party (TAC) and unrelated party (SICGIL) was in the ratio of 95 :5. TAC was a bulk buyer of manufactured goods.


2. Revenue contends that huge difference in the pricing has caused prejudice to Revenue.


3. In the previous final orders referred to above, Tribunal has considered that in absence of any market enquiry done and also peculiar circumstances brought out, it is difficult for the Tribunal to agree with the allegation of Revenue. The present case also suffers from similar difficulties. Therefore, without dilating the matter further, following the judicial discipline, this appeal is also allowed.


(Dictated and pronounced in open court)


(Madhu Mohan Damodhar)                 (D.N. Panda)
Technical Member                     Judicial Member


gs



Additional Info

  • Date Range: Monday, 13 March 2017
  • Court/Authority: CESTAT
  • Tax Type: Central Excise
  • Petitioner/Appellant: Southern Petrochemical Industries Corporation Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Tirunelveli
  • Respondent: Southern Petrochemical Industries Corporation Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Tirunelveli
  • Appl no. or Appl year: Appeal No. E/711/2007
  • Supreme Court Location: Delhi
  • CESTAT Location: Chennai
  • AAR Location: Delhi
  • Authority: Supreme Court

A New Feature :

Advanced Case Law Search

 

7th April, 2016

The “Advanced Case Law Search” feature in TaxQuotient  enables search on separate parameters such as Court, Tax Type, Date (from & to Range), appellant, respondent and even keywords. This helps you in locating case law you are searching for swiftly.

TIP: #1 : If you want to view the latest cases, just enter the start and end dates keeping all other boxes blank. You will get a list of all available indirect tax cases during that period.

TIP # 2 : Please keep the date range (start to end date) for upto 6 months.

TIP # 3 : Don't forget to reset the search to clear the earlier results before a new search.

Click to enter Advanced Case Law Search

 GST Bill passed by Parliament

 

 

 

The 122nd Constitution Amendment Bill introduced in Parliament in December 2014 has been passed by the Rajya Sabha and now also by the Lok Sabha with the amendments.  Now the Bill must get ratified by at least half the number of 31 State Legislatures which means 16 States and then finally get the approval from the President.

Thereafter the GST Council has to be set up which will determine the GST design at the granular level. This will include the structure of GST including scope of CGST, SGST and IGST, the taxes subsumed, the items/commodities covered and other critical aspects such as the threshold limits for taxability, exemptions, and several other parameters critical for an ideal  GST.

Further, for the GST to operate smoothly, the taxes paid on goods and services at every stage in the value chain needs to be tracked. This requires an IT infrastructure which will track the transactions and taxes paid and form the back-bone of GST. Reportedly considerable work has been already done on it, nevertheless it will need changes to correctly reflect the GST Law proposed by the GST Council and accepted by the Central & State Legislatures.

Last but not the least,  the tax authorities and other stakeholders who will implement the GST need to be trained for a smooth introduction.

Seven questions to know if you 

are paying taxes 

correctly?

If you are the CFO or the Tax Head you ought to read this. Click Here

CESTAT Updates

June- July 2016

 

Brief update on CESTAT judgements passed during June 2016 to July 2016. Please note this update is not a summary of the cases but only leads on important issues decided. The links to the judgments are also provided for the full text.

Click here for update

Our Main Services 

in Indirect Taxes

 

  • Business structuring and tax planning
  • Review of end-to-end business processes for indirect taxes
  • Strategy to prevent litigation, representation and litigation support
  • Tax compliance and tax control framework
  • Support on specific issues
Go to top