Single-page GST filing system to be ready in 3-6 months says Finance Secretary Hasmukh Adhia :      E-Way Bill in 6 States for intra-State movement of goods from 20th April. Maharashtra will introduce from 1st May :      GST Council keeps Reverse Charge Mechanism on hold - FinMin clarifies that businesses under composition levy need not furnish related data in GSTR-4 :      GST returns filing: Sushil Modi panel unveils new fusion model :      CBITC sets out procedure to intercept, inspect, detain, seize, release, confiscate goods and conveyances in transit :      Bombay HC - GST leviable on any "consideration" including one-time premium on lease :      Canteen Services will attract 5% GST says Advance Ruling Authority :     

CESTAT Ahmedabad : Shri Jawandamal Dhannamal Vs. Commissioner of CUSTOMS (Appeals) -JAMNAGAR : 10th March, 2017


CUSTOMS EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
O-20, New Mental Hospital Compound, Meghani Nagar,
West Zonal Bench, Ahmedabad 380 014

Appeal No.  : C/356/2010
Arising out of OIA-88/COMMR-A-/JMN/2010 dt 09/06/2010 passed by the Commissioner of CUSTOMS (Appeals) -JAMNAGAR

Shri Jawandamal Dhannamal
Appellant(s)

Vs.

Commissioner of CUSTOMS (Appeals) -JAMNAGAR
Respondent(s)

Represented by
For Applicant(s) : None
For Respondent(s) : Shri L Patra, Authorised Representative

CORAM :
Dr D.M. Misra, Hon'ble Member (Judicial)

Date of Hearing / Decision : 10/03/2017


ORDER NO. A/10607 / 2017

Per : Dr D.M. Misra,

None present for the appellant. Heard the Ld AR for the Revenue.


2. I find that in the proceeding before the Ld Commissioner (Appeals) the appellant challenged the penalty and redemption fine. Considering the evidences and various circumstances of the case, the Ld Commissioner has reduced the redemption fine to Rs 60,000/- and penalty to Rs 50,000/-. The Ld Commissioner (Appeals) at Para 5.8 observed as follows:

Now, dealing with the quantum of fine and penalty imposed on the appellant importer in the impugned order, I have already found in the foregoing paras that the order of the adjudicating authority for confiscation of 85.170 kgs of scrap v/s Rs 13,16,728/- under Section 119 of the Act does not survive in the facts and circumstances of the present case. Consequently, the plea of the appellant for lowering the quantum of redemption fine and penalty imposed in the impugned order crave for some consideration. Having regard to the totality of the attendant facts and he gravity of offence committed by the appellant and also keeping in view that confiscation of HMS v/a Rs 13,16,728/- ordered by the adjudicating authority was found to be not sustainable, I am of the considered view that the ends of justice will be met if the redemption fine and penalty is reduced and re-fixed at Rs 60,000/- (Rupees sixty thousand only) and Rs 50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) respectively and I order so.


3. I do not find any reason to interfere with the said finding of the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) who after considering the circumstances has substantially reduced the redemption and penalty and no additional circumstances brought on record warranting further reduction. In the result, the appeal being devoid of merit, accordingly dismissed.


(Dictated and pronounced in the open Court)


(D.M. Misra)
Member (Judicial)


swami
2

Last modified on Sunday, 19 March 2017 10:46

Additional Info

  • Date Range: Friday, 10 March 2017
  • Court/Authority: CESTAT
  • Tax Type: Customs duty
  • Petitioner/Appellant: Shri Jawandamal Dhannamal Vs. Commissioner of CUSTOMS (Appeals) -JAMNAGAR
  • Respondent: Shri Jawandamal Dhannamal Vs. Commissioner of CUSTOMS (Appeals) -JAMNAGAR
  • Appl no. or Appl year: Appeal No. : C/356/2010
  • Supreme Court Location: Delhi
  • CESTAT Location: Ahmedabad
  • AAR Location: Delhi
  • Authority: Supreme Court

Seven questions to know if you 

are paying taxes 

correctly?

If you are the CFO or the Tax Head you ought to read this. Click Here


 

Brief update on CESTAT judgements passed during June 2016 to July 2016. Please note this update is not a summary of the cases but only leads on important issues decided. The links to the judgments are also provided for the full text.

Click here for update

Central, Integrated & UT Tax Notifications,Circulars

Tax type

Notification/s

Circulars

Central Tax

21 dated 18/04/18

414243 all dated 13/04/18

Central Tax Rate

10 dt 23/03/18

 -

Integrated Tax

1/2018 dt 23/03/18

2/1/2017 dt 27/09/17

Integrated Tax Rate

No 11/2018 dt 23/03/18

 -

Union Territory Tax

06/2018 dt 31/03/18

 -

Union Territory Tax Rate

10/2018 dt 23/03/18

-

Compensation Cess None so far

1/1/2017 dt 26/07/17

Compensation Cess Rate 01/2018 dt 25/01/2018  -

 Click here for earlier GST Notifications & Circulars

Circulars under C.Ex, Customs & Service Tax


  • 24th Jan 2018 - Allahabad High Court directs Govt to extend the period to file GST Tran-1 as petitioner's application for transitional credit as  electronic GST system was not accepted on the last date i.e. 27.12.2017. As a result, the petitioner was likely to suffer loss of credit due to delay. - Continental India Private Limited  Vs UOI & Ors
  • 6th Feb 2018 - Bombay High Court passed an order against a petition filed on GST. The petitioner was unable to access GST Network. E-Way Bills are yet to come into force and without it,  petitioner was unable to move goods anywhere, paralysing its business and making it unable to comply. Though the petitioner was provided partial access after the petition was filed, they are still unable to file returns. Payment of tax was not possible without filing return. The matter was posted for another hearing on 16th February.
    The Court noted that similar grievances were raised before the Allahabad High court in Continental India Private Ltd. Vs UOI Writ (Tax) No. 67 of 2018. The Division Bench directed the respondents to reopen the portal and and entertain the application of the petitioner. - Abicor and Binzel Technoweld Pvt. Ltd. V/s UOI

Economic Survey of India 2017-18

Click here for the documents

Our Main Services 

in Indirect Taxes

 

  • Business structuring and tax planning
  • Review of end-to-end business processes for indirect taxes
  • Strategy to prevent litigation, representation and litigation support
  • Tax compliance and tax control framework
  • Support on specific issues
Go to top