Single-page GST filing system to be ready in 3-6 months says Finance Secretary Hasmukh Adhia :      E-Way Bill in 6 States for intra-State movement of goods from 20th April. Maharashtra will introduce from 1st May :      GST Council keeps Reverse Charge Mechanism on hold - FinMin clarifies that businesses under composition levy need not furnish related data in GSTR-4 :      GST returns filing: Sushil Modi panel unveils new fusion model :      CBITC sets out procedure to intercept, inspect, detain, seize, release, confiscate goods and conveyances in transit :      Bombay HC - GST leviable on any "consideration" including one-time premium on lease :      Canteen Services will attract 5% GST says Advance Ruling Authority :     

CESTAT Chennai : M/s. East Coast Construction & Industries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, Chennai : 10th March, 2017

IN THE CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
SOUTH ZONAL BENCH, CHENNAI

ST/5/2008
(Arising out of Order-in-Appeal No. 122/2007 dated 10.10.2007 passed by the Commissioner of Service Tax, Chennai)

M/s. East Coast Construction & Industries Ltd.
Appellant

Vs.

Commissioner of Service Tax, Chennai
Respondent

Appearance
Shri Vikram Ramakrishnan, Advocate for the Appellant
Shri K.P. Muralidharan, AC (AR) for the Respondent

CORAM
Honble Shri D.N. Panda, Judicial Member
Honble Shri Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Technical Member

Date of Hearing / Decision: 10.03.2017


FINAL ORDER No. 40433 / 2017

Per D.N. Panda

Appellant does not dispute the tax liability. It has also paid interest.


2. The prayer of the appellant is that due to financial difficulties it could not discharge the tax liability for which there is a penalty imposed under section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994. Appellant therefore prays that the Tribunal may consider this case under section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994 to exonerate from penalty, since tax liability has been discharged.


2. Revenue does not dispute discharge of tax liability.


3. Heard both sides and perused the records.


4. Considering that at the initial stage of implementation of the tax law, there was a serious confusion as to the taxability and the taxing entry under which tax shall be imposed till resolution of the dispute in the case of Larsen & Toubro Ltd. Vs. State of Karnataka reported in 2014 (34) STR 481 (SC).


5. In view of the above, there shall be no penalty on the appellant under section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994.


6. In the result, appeal is partly allowed to this extent.


(Dictated and pronounced in open court)


(Madhu Mohan Damodhar)                           (D.N. Panda)
Technical Member                                         Judicial Member


Rex

Additional Info

  • Date Range: Friday, 10 March 2017
  • Court/Authority: CESTAT
  • Tax Type: Central Excise
  • Petitioner/Appellant: M/s. East Coast Construction & Industries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, Chennai
  • Respondent: M/s. East Coast Construction & Industries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, Chennai
  • Appl no. or Appl year: ST/5/2008
  • Supreme Court Location: Delhi
  • CESTAT Location: Chennai
  • AAR Location: Delhi
  • Authority: Supreme Court

Seven questions to know if you 

are paying taxes 

correctly?

If you are the CFO or the Tax Head you ought to read this. Click Here


 

Brief update on CESTAT judgements passed during June 2016 to July 2016. Please note this update is not a summary of the cases but only leads on important issues decided. The links to the judgments are also provided for the full text.

Click here for update

Central, Integrated & UT Tax Notifications,Circulars

Tax type

Notification/s

Circulars

Central Tax

21 dated 18/04/18

414243 all dated 13/04/18

Central Tax Rate

10 dt 23/03/18

 -

Integrated Tax

1/2018 dt 23/03/18

2/1/2017 dt 27/09/17

Integrated Tax Rate

No 11/2018 dt 23/03/18

 -

Union Territory Tax

06/2018 dt 31/03/18

 -

Union Territory Tax Rate

10/2018 dt 23/03/18

-

Compensation Cess None so far

1/1/2017 dt 26/07/17

Compensation Cess Rate 01/2018 dt 25/01/2018  -

 Click here for earlier GST Notifications & Circulars

Circulars under C.Ex, Customs & Service Tax


  • 24th Jan 2018 - Allahabad High Court directs Govt to extend the period to file GST Tran-1 as petitioner's application for transitional credit as  electronic GST system was not accepted on the last date i.e. 27.12.2017. As a result, the petitioner was likely to suffer loss of credit due to delay. - Continental India Private Limited  Vs UOI & Ors
  • 6th Feb 2018 - Bombay High Court passed an order against a petition filed on GST. The petitioner was unable to access GST Network. E-Way Bills are yet to come into force and without it,  petitioner was unable to move goods anywhere, paralysing its business and making it unable to comply. Though the petitioner was provided partial access after the petition was filed, they are still unable to file returns. Payment of tax was not possible without filing return. The matter was posted for another hearing on 16th February.
    The Court noted that similar grievances were raised before the Allahabad High court in Continental India Private Ltd. Vs UOI Writ (Tax) No. 67 of 2018. The Division Bench directed the respondents to reopen the portal and and entertain the application of the petitioner. - Abicor and Binzel Technoweld Pvt. Ltd. V/s UOI

Economic Survey of India 2017-18

Click here for the documents

Our Main Services 

in Indirect Taxes

 

  • Business structuring and tax planning
  • Review of end-to-end business processes for indirect taxes
  • Strategy to prevent litigation, representation and litigation support
  • Tax compliance and tax control framework
  • Support on specific issues
Go to top