PNB fraud due to failure of internal control, says RBI.:      Celeb jeweller Nirav Modi named in PNB’s $1.77-b fraud. Bank suspends 10 officers, lodges complaint with CBI; more banks may be hit. :      Bombay High Court in a hearing on 6th Feb, 2018 says GST regime is not user friendly. :      GST Network Chairman Ajay Bhushan return simplification panel to meet industry this week to simplify the return filing process.:    Finance Secretary Hasmukh Adhia said the Government stares at a Rs 50,000 crore GST revenue shortfall in the current fiscal. :    E-Way Bill which was to be rolled-out on 1st Feb is deferred to month-end due to technical glitches.:      TN raked in 22% more GST at Rs 23,318 crore between Jul-Dec 2017, against Rs 19,018 crore under VAT in the corresponding period the previous year. :      MoS,Corp Affairs PP Chaudhary says in Rajya Sabha that Govt has detected GST evasion of Rs 5.70 Crores in 16 cases during Jul-Nov 2017 - 6th Feb 2018. :      FM, Arun Jaitley says that States are not in favour of bringing the petroleum products under GST. :      The Finance Secretary, Hasmukh Adhia says out of 7 lakh tax payers who opted for composition scheme 5 lakhs had a turnover less than Rs 5 lakhs pa, though the exemption limit is upto Rs 20 lakhs. :     

CESTAT Chennai : M/s. EID Parry (India) Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Puducherry : 10th March, 2017

IN THE CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
SOUTH ZONAL BENCH, CHENNAI

ST/210/2007
(Arising out of Order-in-Revision No. 8/2007 dated 30.5.2007 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Pondicherry)

M/s. EID Parry (India) Limited
Appellant

Vs.

Commissioner of Central Excise, Puducherry
Respondent

Appearance
Ms. Minchu Mariam Punnose, Advocate for the Appellant
Shri S. Govindarajan, AC (AR) for the Respondent

CORAM
Honble Shri D.N. Panda, Judicial Member
Honble Shri Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Technical Member

Date of Hearing / Decision: 10.03.2017


FINAL ORDER No. 40432 / 2017

Per D.N. Panda

Without the provision for recovery of tax on reverse charge mechanism prior to 18.4.2006 and such proposition not being differed by Revenue, appeal is allowed. This order has been passed following the ratio laid down by the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Union of India Vs. Indian National ShipownersAssociation reported in 2011 (21) STR 3 (SC).


2. There is no vakalat on record of the learned counsel arguing the matter today. She is directed to file the vakalat by Monday i.e. 13th March 2017.


(Dictated and pronounced in open court)


(Madhu Mohan Damodhar)                           (D.N. Panda)
Technical Member                                         Judicial Member

Rex


Additional Info

  • Date Range: Friday, 10 March 2017
  • Court/Authority: CESTAT
  • Tax Type: Service Tax
  • Petitioner/Appellant: M/s. EID Parry (India) Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Puducherry
  • Respondent: M/s. EID Parry (India) Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Puducherry
  • Appl no. or Appl year: ST/210/2007
  • Supreme Court Location: Delhi
  • CESTAT Location: Chennai
  • AAR Location: Delhi
  • Authority: Supreme Court

Seven questions to know if you 

are paying taxes 

correctly?

If you are the CFO or the Tax Head you ought to read this. Click Here

Our Main Services 

in Indirect Taxes

 

  • Business structuring and tax planning
  • Review of end-to-end business processes for indirect taxes
  • Strategy to prevent litigation, representation and litigation support
  • Tax compliance and tax control framework
  • Support on specific issues


 

Brief update on CESTAT judgements passed during June 2016 to July 2016. Please note this update is not a summary of the cases but only leads on important issues decided. The links to the judgments are also provided for the full text.

Click here for update

Go to top