PNB fraud due to failure of internal control, says RBI.:      Celeb jeweller Nirav Modi named in PNB’s $1.77-b fraud. Bank suspends 10 officers, lodges complaint with CBI; more banks may be hit. :      Bombay High Court in a hearing on 6th Feb, 2018 says GST regime is not user friendly. :      GST Network Chairman Ajay Bhushan return simplification panel to meet industry this week to simplify the return filing process.:    Finance Secretary Hasmukh Adhia said the Government stares at a Rs 50,000 crore GST revenue shortfall in the current fiscal. :    E-Way Bill which was to be rolled-out on 1st Feb is deferred to month-end due to technical glitches.:      TN raked in 22% more GST at Rs 23,318 crore between Jul-Dec 2017, against Rs 19,018 crore under VAT in the corresponding period the previous year. :      MoS,Corp Affairs PP Chaudhary says in Rajya Sabha that Govt has detected GST evasion of Rs 5.70 Crores in 16 cases during Jul-Nov 2017 - 6th Feb 2018. :      FM, Arun Jaitley says that States are not in favour of bringing the petroleum products under GST. :      The Finance Secretary, Hasmukh Adhia says out of 7 lakh tax payers who opted for composition scheme 5 lakhs had a turnover less than Rs 5 lakhs pa, though the exemption limit is upto Rs 20 lakhs. :     

CESTAT Chennai : M/s. Roots Multiclean Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Coimbatore : 10th March, 2017


IN THE CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
SOUTH ZONAL BENCH, CHENNAI

E/560 & 561/2008
(Arising out of Order-in-Appeal No.92 & 93/2008-CE dated 29.9.2008 passed by the Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax (Appeals), Coimbatore)

M/s. Roots Multiclean Ltd.
Appellant

Vs.

Commissioner of Central Excise, Coimbatore
Respondent

Appearance
Shri K. Subash Chandran, Advocate for the Appellant
Shri R. Subramaniyam, AC (AR) for the Respondent

CORAM
Honble Shri D.N. Panda, Judicial Member
Honble Shri Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Technical Member

Date of Hearing / Decision: 10.03.2017


FINAL ORDER Nos. 40430-40431 / 2017

Per D.N. Panda

Appellant says that the goods in question were Automatic Scrubber Driver and its Accessoriesand that is stored for consumption on board, a vessel of the Indian Navy as has been certified by the Naval authority in terms of the copy of the certificate No. LP/10083/800(a)7/05-06 dated 16th May 2006 and No. LP/00051/800(a)7/06-07 dated 27th October 2006 (available at pages 33 and 36 of the appeal folder). This certificate shows that the goods in question were exclusively purchased for use on board in Naval Ship. Therefore, the appellant is entitled to exemption under Notification No. 64/95-CE dated 16.3.1995.


2. Revenue says that those goods were not used in the vessel on board of Indian Navy.


3. Heard both sides and perused the records.


4. To agree with Revenue, there is no material on record conducting any enquiry. Therefore, there can neither be a presumption in favour of Revenue without Tribunal having power to presume certain things to hold in its favour. Accordingly, appellant cannot be denied the benefit of the exemption Notification which is permissible in terms of the certificate issued by the naval authority.


5. In the result, both the appeals are allowed.


(Dictated and pronounced in open court)


(Madhu Mohan Damodhar)                           (D.N. Panda)
Technical Member                                         Judicial Member


Rex


Additional Info

  • Date Range: Friday, 10 March 2017
  • Court/Authority: CESTAT
  • Tax Type: Central Excise
  • Petitioner/Appellant: M/s. Roots Multiclean Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Coimbatore
  • Respondent: M/s. Roots Multiclean Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Coimbatore
  • Appl no. or Appl year: E/560 & 561/2008
  • Supreme Court Location: Delhi
  • CESTAT Location: Chennai
  • AAR Location: Delhi
  • Authority: Supreme Court

Seven questions to know if you 

are paying taxes 

correctly?

If you are the CFO or the Tax Head you ought to read this. Click Here

Our Main Services 

in Indirect Taxes

 

  • Business structuring and tax planning
  • Review of end-to-end business processes for indirect taxes
  • Strategy to prevent litigation, representation and litigation support
  • Tax compliance and tax control framework
  • Support on specific issues


 

Brief update on CESTAT judgements passed during June 2016 to July 2016. Please note this update is not a summary of the cases but only leads on important issues decided. The links to the judgments are also provided for the full text.

Click here for update

Go to top