PNB fraud due to failure of internal control, says RBI.:      Celeb jeweller Nirav Modi named in PNB’s $1.77-b fraud. Bank suspends 10 officers, lodges complaint with CBI; more banks may be hit. :      Bombay High Court in a hearing on 6th Feb, 2018 says GST regime is not user friendly. :      GST Network Chairman Ajay Bhushan return simplification panel to meet industry this week to simplify the return filing process.:    Finance Secretary Hasmukh Adhia said the Government stares at a Rs 50,000 crore GST revenue shortfall in the current fiscal. :    E-Way Bill which was to be rolled-out on 1st Feb is deferred to month-end due to technical glitches.:      TN raked in 22% more GST at Rs 23,318 crore between Jul-Dec 2017, against Rs 19,018 crore under VAT in the corresponding period the previous year. :      MoS,Corp Affairs PP Chaudhary says in Rajya Sabha that Govt has detected GST evasion of Rs 5.70 Crores in 16 cases during Jul-Nov 2017 - 6th Feb 2018. :      FM, Arun Jaitley says that States are not in favour of bringing the petroleum products under GST. :      The Finance Secretary, Hasmukh Adhia says out of 7 lakh tax payers who opted for composition scheme 5 lakhs had a turnover less than Rs 5 lakhs pa, though the exemption limit is upto Rs 20 lakhs. :     

CESTAT Chennai : M/s.Gemini Traders & Ors Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Import), Chennai : 10th March, 2017


C/594 to 604/2006
(Arising out of Order-in-Appeal C. Cus. No.681/06 to 691/06 dated 14.9.2006 passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Chennai)

1. M/s.Gemini Traders
2. M/s.Gemini Traders
3. M/s. Victory Traders
4. M/s. N.K. Oil Corporation
5. M/s. N.K. Oil Corporation
6. M/s. N.K. Oil Corporation
7. M/s. N.K. Oil Corporation
8. M/s. KTV Oil Mills AC Diamond Oil Agency
9. M/s. KTV Oil Mills
10. M/s. KTV Oil Mills AC Diamond Oil Agency
11. M/s. Diamond Oil Agency


Commissioner of Customs (Import), Chennai

Shri J. Shankar Raman, Advocate for the Appellant
Shri A. Cletus, Addl. Commissioner (AR) for the Respondent
Honble Shri D.N. Panda, Judicial Member
Honble Shri Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Technical Member

Date of Hearing / Decision: 10.03.2017

FINAL ORDER Nos. 40419-40429 / 2017
Per D.N. Panda
Appellant says that when the goods are stored in the bonded warehouse in terms of section 15, the date on which the Bill of Entry presented for home consumption of the goods in the bonded warehouse shall be determinative for the rate of exchange.

2. On the other hand, Revenues contention is that there is a specific provision in section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962, how to deal with the entry of goods into the country.

3. Law is very clear that the rate of exchange shall be determinative with reference to section 14 of the said Act. That section makes reference of the goods which enters into India under section 46 thereof. When there is a codified provision provided under section14 to be read with section 46, there shall be no different proposition of law. Accordingly, the date on which the Bill of Entry is presented that shall be decisive for the purpose of determination of rate of exchange.

4. Accordingly, the contention of the appellant fails to sustain for which all the appeals are dismissed.

(Dictated and pronounced in open court)

(Madhu Mohan Damodhar)                           (D.N. Panda)
Technical Member                                         Judicial Member


Additional Info

  • Date Range: Friday, 10 March 2017
  • Court/Authority: CESTAT
  • Tax Type: Customs duty
  • Petitioner/Appellant: M/s.Gemini Traders & Ors Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Import), Chennai
  • Respondent: M/s.Gemini Traders & Ors Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Import), Chennai
  • Appl no. or Appl year: C/594 to 604/2006
  • Supreme Court Location: Delhi
  • CESTAT Location: Chennai
  • AAR Location: Delhi
  • Authority: Supreme Court

Seven questions to know if you 

are paying taxes 


If you are the CFO or the Tax Head you ought to read this. Click Here

Our Main Services 

in Indirect Taxes


  • Business structuring and tax planning
  • Review of end-to-end business processes for indirect taxes
  • Strategy to prevent litigation, representation and litigation support
  • Tax compliance and tax control framework
  • Support on specific issues


Brief update on CESTAT judgements passed during June 2016 to July 2016. Please note this update is not a summary of the cases but only leads on important issues decided. The links to the judgments are also provided for the full text.

Click here for update

Go to top