Government officials said on Thursday that the RBI had enough powers to act against errant lenders. :      US challenges India's export subsidy program at WTO :      Export growth: Slow GST refunds, volatile currency may hit Feb numbers, too :      No extension for selling pre-GST stock with revised MRP: Paswan :      GST one of the most complex, and second highest tax rate in world: World Bank :      Lok Sabha passes Finance Bill amid din, without debate or vote :      Kamal Haasan says GST should be thrown into wastebasket

Whether A Judicial Member is a must for Advance Ruling Authority

20th February, 2018

The Gujarat High Court recently admitted a Special Civil Application NO. 18030 of 2017 filed by Nipun Praveen Singhvi relating to the Authority of Advance Ruling (AAR) and the Appellate Authority of Advance Ruling (AAAR) under the Central GST. The matter will be next heard on 13th April, 2018.

The application seeks that the High Court declare the relevant CGST provisions as ultra vires the Constitution as the Benches do not include a judicial member.

Traditionally, the Authority for Advance Rulings in the legacy taxes like central excise,  customs and service tax have always included a Judicial member.  So, this is a departure from the established practice. Also almost every tax tribunal (except single Benches) includes both a Technical Member and Judicial Member.

The Gujarat High Court has issued notices to the Central Government, the GST Council and the Gujarat Government.

In terms of Section 96 of the CGST Act, the Advance Ruling Authority set up under the State GST Act or UT GST Act will be deemed to be the AAR under CGST for that State or UT. The said section reads :

“96. Subject to the provisions of this Chapter, for the purposes of this Act, the Authority for advance ruling constituted under the provisions of a State Goods and Services Tax Act or Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Act shall be deemed to be the Authority for advance ruling in respect of that State or Union territory.”

The corresponding provisions in the State GST Act (extract from AP GST Act) which set-out the modalities of constituting the AAR and the AAAR are contained in Section 96 and 99 respectively. The said sections prescribe constituting the AAR and AAAR by appointing officers from Central Tax and State Tax. 

Section 96 reads :

"96. (1) The Government shall, by notification, constitute an Authority to be known as the Andhra Pradesh Authority for Advance Ruling:

Provided that the Government may, on the recommendation of the Council, notify any Authority located in another State to act as the Authority for the State.

(2) The Authority shall consist of,-

(i) one member from amongst the officers of Central tax; and
(ii) one member from amongst the officers of State tax, to be appointed by the Central Government and the State Government respectively.

(3) The qualifications, the method of appointment of the members and the terms and conditions of their services shall be such as may be prescribed."

Section 99 reads :

"99. The Government shall, by notification, constitute an Authority to be known as the Andhra Pradesh Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling for Goods and Services Tax for hearing appeals against the advance ruling pronounced by the Advance Ruling Authority consisting of,-

(i) the Chief Commissioner of Central tax as designated by the Board; and
(ii) the Chief Commissioner of State tax:

Provided that the Government may, on the recommendations of the Council, notify any Appellate Authority located in another State or Union territory to act as the Appellate Authority for the State."

It should be noted that the AAR and the AAAR under section 105 of the CGST Act will like the AARs in the legacy tax laws will also be a deemed Civil Court and will exercise powers under the Civil Procedure Code regarding discovery & inspection, enforcing attendance, issuing commissions and compelling production of records, accounts etc. Section 105 reads :

"105. (1) The Authority or the Appellate Authority shall, for the purpose of exercising its powers regarding—

(a) discovery and inspection;
(b) enforcing the attendance of any person and examining him on oath;
(c) issuing commissions and compelling production of books of account and other records, have all the powers of a civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

(2) The Authority or the Appellate Authority shall be deemed to be a civil court for the purposes of section 195, but not for the purposes of Chapter XXVI of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and every proceeding before the Authority or the Appellate Authority shall be deemed to be a judicial proceedings within the meaning of sections 193 and 228, and for the purpose of section 196 of the Indian Penal Code."

Apart from the Constitutionality, Advance Ruling is an important mechanism in taxation which reduces tax uncertainties.  It creates a conducive transparent environment, encouraging investment.  Creating tax certainty is especially important in the context of a new introduced GST which became effective from 1st July 2017. The quality of the orders from AAR will be considerably enhanced if expertise in Technical and Judicial aspects are drawn upon.

Central & Integrated Tax Notifications

Central Tax



Central Tax Rate



Integrated Tax



Integrated Tax Rate



Union Territory Tax



Union Territory Tax Rate




Indirect Risk Tax Management




Seven questions to know if you 

are paying taxes 


If you are the CFO or the Tax Head you ought to read this. Click Here


Brief update on CESTAT judgements passed during June 2016 to July 2016. Please note this update is not a summary of the cases but only leads on important issues decided. The links to the judgments are also provided for the full text.

Click here for update

Welcome to Tax Quotient

Click to read the message from TQ

The CBEC has accepted 63 orders passed by CESTAT, High Court and the Supreme Court and decided not to pursue the matters in appeal. This has been confirmed through a Circular No 1063/2/2018-CX dated 16.02.2018. Naturally, this is a step in the right direction towards reducing litigation. Click to read the circular

  • 24th Jan 2018 - Allahabad High Court directs Govt to extend the period to file GST Tran-1 as petitioner's application for transitional credit as  electronic GST system was not accepted on the last date i.e. 27.12.2017. As a result, the petitioner was likely to suffer loss of credit due to delay. - Continental India Private Limited  Vs UOI & Ors
  • 6th Feb 2018 - Bombay High Court passed an order against a petition filed on GST. The petitioner was unable to access GST Network. E-Way Bills are yet to come into force and without it,  petitioner was unable to move goods anywhere, paralysing its business and making it unable to comply. Though the petitioner was provided partial access after the petition was filed, they are still unable to file returns. Payment of tax was not possible without filing return. The matter was posted for another hearing on 16th February.
    The Court noted that similar grievances were raised before the Allahabad High court in Continental India Private Ltd. Vs UOI Writ (Tax) No. 67 of 2018. The Division Bench directed the respondents to reopen the portal and and entertain the application of the petitioner. - Abicor and Binzel Technoweld Pvt. Ltd. V/s UOI

Economic Survey of India 2017-18

Click here for the documents

Tax Management



Tax Risk Management Part 1

An Introduction


Risk comes from not 

knowing what you’re doing. 

- Warren Buffet

Read the Article


Tax Risk Management Part 2

Tax Risks as 

Black Swan Events!

If you were asked "

What 'tax risks' 

you perceive in your 


What would be 

your answer?

Read the Article

Our Main Services 

in Indirect Taxes


  • Business structuring and tax planning
  • Review of end-to-end business processes for indirect taxes
  • Strategy to prevent litigation, representation and litigation support
  • Tax compliance and tax control framework
  • Support on specific issues
Go to top